# LrrK Kinematic Consumer Risk Bulletin **LRRK Watch / Open-Source Intelligence** — Consumer systems that sense, move, and act in homes and yards. **Issue type.** Monthly filing. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Collection cutoff | 31 October 2019 | | Platform | Quiet Systems | | Window | 1–31 October 2019 | | Data label | Open-source intelligence // LRRK analytic product // retrospective monthly filing | | Handling | Public-source material. Image rights require separate verification before publication. Retrospective reconstruction from contemporaneous public records. | | Scope | Consumer kinematic electronics only (home, yard, companion, educational). | | Classes in frame | Robot vacuums / mop combos · robotic lawn mowers · window-cleaning robots · pool-cleaning robots · robot pets / companion animals · social / desk companions · educational / programmable kits · robotic litter boxes · security / home patrol robots · consumer robotic arms · elder-care / assistive companions · kitchen / food-prep robots · toy / entertainment robots · niche outdoor / garden robots · emerging general-purpose or humanoid home robots | | Spine | CPSC, Health Canada, EU Safety Gate, UK OPSS, manufacturer recall pages, named newsrooms, dockets, SEC. | | Color | Message boards, consumer forums, and Reddit — annotated context only. Never Fact without a reputable primary. | ## Executive read ### BLUF October is a category-control docket, not a harm file. On 15 October iRobot sued SharkNinja in D. Mass. (1:19-cv-12125) and moved for a preliminary injunction against the Shark IQ Robot on three patents (selected-room cleaning, recharge-and-resume with mapping, auto-evacuation). No official recall. No companion brick. No mower injury. ### Key judgments 1. **[Assessment — High confidence]** 1:19-cv-12125 and the 15 October PI motion are verified. This is IP category control, not crush, fire, or privacy. 2. **[Assessment — Hi`è confidence]** No October CPSC, Health Canada, OPSS, or Safety Gate in-class consumer-robot action was found. 3. **[Inference — Low confidence]** The docket does not, by itself, change the official-recall lane or the Jibo/Anki trust files. ### Analytic labels - **Fact** — verified reporting or primary record - **Assessment** — analytic judgment - **Inference** — reasoned but not directly observed - **Uncertainty** — unresolved information gap ### Source grades - **A1** — authoritative primary record / directly confirmed - **B1–B2** — generally reliable and corroborated - **C3** — useful but requires caution (typical for forums) --- ## 01. iRobot v SharkNinja — D. Mass. 1:19-cv-12125; PI on Shark IQ Robot *Event / publication dates: 15 October 2019 (complaint and PI motion; iRobot media)* **Product class.** Robot vacuums / mop combos **Verified record — [Fact — A1]** iRobot Corp. v. SharkNinja Operating, LLC, SharkNinja Management, LLC, and SharkNinja Sales Company, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, **1:19-cv-12125**. PI motion filed **15 October 2019** seeks to enjoin making, using, selling, offering, or importing the Shark IQ Robot (with and without self-empty base) for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. **9,492,048** (auto-evacuation), **9,921,586** (selected room cleaning), and **9,550,294** (recharge and resume with mapping). [RECAP motion](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.214951/gov.uscourts.mad.214951.2.0.pdf). iRobot media, same day: PI “to halt its sales and distribution of its Shark IQ Robot”; complaint also names three further patents on rollers/modularity; follows a 2018 ITC exclusion order against other respondents. [iRobot, 15 October 2019](https://media.irobot.com/2019-10-15-iRobot-Files-for-a-Preliminary-Injunction-Against-SharkNinja). Secondary: SharkNinja had filed a Delaware declaratory-judgment action 11 October after an 7 October iRobot demand letter (Markman Advisors) — B2, Delaware complaint PDF not opened here. **No judgment this month.** No injury, death, or recall count. **Threat landscape.** Category-control litigation over mapping, room selection, and dock evacuation. Physical-harm record is empty. Trust record is empty. **Forum / community notes.** - none found. **Intelligence assessment.** [Assessment — High confidence] This is an IP fight over premium robot-vac features. [Inference — Low confidence] It does not move the official-recall lane. [Uncertainty] Hearing date and claim construction are unpublished this month. **Opportunity.** A PI order or a settlement that names accused kinematics. **LRRK relevance.** Campaign (who owns the category). Watch: 1:19-cv-12125. **Confidence.** High on the 15 October motion and the three PI patents. Moderate on the Delaware DJ (secondary). Low on outcome. --- ## Forward indicators 1. PI hearing / order in 1:19-cv-12125. 2. EN 50636 prA2 if a 2019 official draft is dated. 3. Anki named buyer — not an October Fact. 4. Dated Jibo cut-over. 5. First 2019 official consumer-robot recall (none found). > **Collection integrity.** One signal. Official ID: **D. Mass. 1:19-cv-12125** (filed 15 October 2019). **Killed:** recall or injury in this docket; Roomba CPSC recall; Anki April mass brick; court anti-brick ruling; Pertisau as 2019; 2020 Dexter / Clean Base; Amazon Astro; November PI denial previewed as October Fact. No October CPSC / Health Canada / OPSS / Safety Gate in-class page. Forum empty. *LRRK — security assurance for systems that sense, move, and act.*

L-C3