LC-2 · Software Danger Reports
LrrK Kinematic Software Danger Report
Source-imported record. This page is not a QSVFF-sealed filing or a verification certificate.
# LrrK Kinematic Software Danger Report **LRRK Watch / Software Assurance** — Monthly filing. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Collection cutoff | 30 June 2015 | | Platform | Quiet Systems | | Series | DKSR-M-2015-06 | | Status | short | | Data label | Open-source intelligence // LRRK analytic product | | Handling | Public-source material. Retrospective monthly. Image rights require separate verification before publication. | ## Executive read ### BLUF Independent 2015 experimental confirmation that civil UAV GNSS remains spoofable after Kerns 2014. Spoofing takes the vehicle off course; chosen-point capture is a harder claim. ### Key judgments 1. **[Assessment — High confidence]** 15 June 2015, Journal of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing 4(2):57–65. 2. **[Assessment — High confidence]** Authors conclude taking the UAV to a chosen target point is hardly feasible without knowing guidance internals. 3. **[Uncertainty]** Specific airframe SKU is not established. Paper is GNSS-effect, not a named consumer SKU. ### Analytic labels - **Fact** — verified reporting or primary record - **Assessment** — analytic judgment - **Inference** — reasoned but not directly observed - **Uncertainty** — unresolved information gap ### Source grades - **A1** — authoritative primary record / directly confirmed - **B1–B2** — generally reliable and corroborated - **C3** — useful but requires caution ## 01. Seo / Lee / Im / Jee: GPS spoofing effect on a civil UAV *Event / publication dates: 15 June 2015 (JPNT 4(2):57–65)* | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Component | hardware | | Product | Civil GNSS receiver on an autonomous-navigation UAV (field experiment) | | CVE / advisory | no CVE | | Patch | none | | Exploit status | public writeup | | Taxonomy | CWE-345 (class) · CAPEC-148 · OWASP IoT I7 | **Verified record — [Fact — A1] DOI 10.11003/jpnt.2015.4.2.057. https://doi.org/10.11003/jpnt.2015.4.2.057 · https://www.jpnt.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/JPNT-0402-02.pdf** **Exposure.** Unauthenticated civil GNSS. Sense → Move. **Intelligence assessment.** [Assessment — High confidence] Publication date. [Uncertainty] Airframe identity. **Opportunity.** Pair with Kerns 2014. Watch Qihoo Phantom 3 geofence (August). **LRRK relevance.** Sense-Move-Act. **Confidence.** High on date. Moderate on SKU. ## Forward indicators 1. Qihoo Unicorn Team DEF CON 23 (August 2015). 2. Luo DEF CON 24 GPS half (August 2016). > **Collection integrity.** One paper. Not padded. No exploit steps. *LRRK — security assurance for systems that sense, move, and act.* <p align="right"><span style="opacity:0.35;letter-spacing:0.18em;font-size:0.8em">L-C2</span></p>